Competitive Bidding: A Powerful Tool to Cut Costs in Manufacturing Companies
The double impact of competitive bidding: better scope, better price.
The manufacturing industry is competitive.
Margins are under constant pressure from rising labor costs, supply chain disruptions, and market volatility. Many companies focus heavily on reducing production costs but overlook a significant opportunity: competitive bidding for non-core services.
By applying a structured bidding process to functions such as cleaning, maintenance, security, marketing, and bookkeeping, manufacturers can unlock a double effect in savings. First, by reviewing and reducing the scope of the service to match current needs. Second, by inviting multiple providers to compete for the newly defined scope and selecting the most competitive offer.
Done correctly, competitive bidding is not just a cost-cutting tactic: it is a strategic procurement method that can enhance service quality, improve vendor accountability, and boost long-term financial performance.
You can also run these every year or two.
Three Key Reasons to Use Competitive Bidding for Non-Core Services
1. Broad Applicability Across Multiple Business Services
Many manufacturing companies keep long-standing service providers without revisiting contracts. Over time, service scope often expands unnecessarily, prices drift upward, and market competitiveness is lost. Competitive bidding can be applied to several areas:
Cleaning services: Adjusting frequency and scope to reflect actual usage.
Maintenance contracts: Moving from fixed monthly arrangements to needs-based or hybrid models.
Security services: Tailoring staffing levels and coverage hours to true risk assessments.
Marketing services: Comparing agencies or freelancers for cost, capability, and responsiveness.
Bookkeeping and administrative outsourcing: Ensuring competitive hourly rates and efficient processes.
These services are often recurring expenses with substantial cumulative costs, making them prime targets for structured bidding.
2. The Double Effect in Savings
The real power of competitive bidding comes from attacking the cost problem from two angles:
Scope Reduction: First, evaluate the actual service requirements. Many companies pay for excess capacity or features that add minimal value. By defining a more realistic scope, you eliminate unnecessary spending before even going to market.
Price Competition: Once the streamlined scope is established, invite multiple qualified vendors to submit proposals. Price competition often yields an additional 10% to 25% savings (on top of the reductions from scope adjustment).
The combined impact can be dramatic. For example, a plant paying $120,000 annually for maintenance could cut the scope by 15% ($18,000) and then secure a 20% price reduction on the remainder ($20,400), saving a total of $38,400 per year without sacrificing quality.
3. A Proven Process That Improves Service Quality
Contrary to the belief that competitive bidding only drives prices down, a well-run process can improve service quality. Clear scope definitions, detailed performance requirements, and transparent selection criteria encourage vendors to present their best teams, tools, and processes.
The key is to structure the process to assess both price and value. This means considering vendor experience, safety records, quality control processes, and responsiveness in addition to cost.
How to Create a Successful Bidding Process
A poorly managed bidding process can waste time and even lead to higher costs. To maximize the benefits, manufacturers should follow these steps:
Identify Target Services: Focus on high-cost, recurring services where competition is healthy and performance is measurable.
Analyze Current Contracts: Understand what you are currently paying for and the actual value delivered.
Define the Scope Clearly: Write a concise and realistic service description that avoids vague terms and ensures all bidders are pricing the same requirements.
Select Qualified Vendors: Pre-screen vendors based on experience, references, and compliance with legal and safety standards.
Issue a Formal Request for Proposal (RFP): Use a standardized template to ensure fairness and comparability.
Evaluate Bids Objectively: Use a scoring matrix defined by the users to compare price, quality, and vendor fit.
Negotiate and Award: Select the vendor that offers the best total value, not just the lowest price.
Monitor and Review Performance: Set performance KPIs and review them regularly to ensure ongoing value.
Conclusion
Competitive bidding is one of the most straightforward and impactful strategies manufacturing companies can use to lower costs without sacrificing quality. By targeting non-core services such as cleaning, maintenance, security, marketing, and bookkeeping (and applying the double savings effect of scope reduction and price competition) companies can free up significant cash for growth initiatives.
With a clear process, any manufacturing company can launch a fair, efficient, and results-driven bidding process.
